"It has been proven you have lost at least 95% of the creativity
you once had. Want it back ?" |
TRIZ
- Part 1
Today I want to introduce you to a concept called TRIZ - Theory of Inventive
Problem Solving, and it’s the subject of one of my newest workshops.
Genrikh Altshuller was a successful Russian inventor, getting his first
patent at the age of only nine years old. Now, he studied the concept
of inventing and became frustrated that there were no books or really
a lot of information on how to invent. He just didn’t believe that
invention and innovation was based on just pure luck or magic.
So what he did with some of his colleagues is they looked at over two
million patents, looking for common patterns, and they found out that
out of those two million patents, there’s really only about 1500
problems that are out there. And what’s more surprising is they
categorized the solutions and found that there’s really only forty
solutions to any known problem that’s out there.
So Altshuller then took this amazing finding that he had and wrote a letter
to Stalin telling him that basically he’d been wasting a lot of
time and resources inventing in this country, that there’s a lot
simpler and more straightforward approach to do it. Well, Stalin took
a couple of years before he responded to the letter, but he finally did
and invited him to come talk to him.
Well, he showed up for the meeting and Stalin promptly threw him in jail.
Altshuller continued to think about this concept that there’s only
forty solutions to any problem that’s out there, and about a year
after Stalin died, he was released from jail and released a number of
papers on this concept that he called TRIZ - which translates in English
roughly to the Theory of Inventive Problem-Solving.
There are a lot of powerful concepts within the TRIZ methodology, but
there’s two culturally shocking underlying concepts. The first one
is that somebody, someplace, has already solved your problem or one very
similar. Creativity is in finding that solution and modifying it to fit
your circumstances. The second one is don’t accept compromises.
Remove the source of the problem.
In this model, I’ve borrowed from my colleague Ellen Domb out of
her book Simplified TRIZ, which by the way is an excellent book for anyone
getting started with the TRIZ principles.
Basically you start with a problem statement, and usually there’s
some contradictions that aren’t allowing you to solve your problems,
so TRIZ is geared around eliminating those contradictions and not living
with them. What are all the available resources both apparent and ones
that are invisible around you to help you reach your ideal final result?
And the ideal final result is the sum of everything good, divided by the
sum of everything bad should approach infinity. So you want all these
good things in your solution, and minimize the amount of bad things. It’s
these forty principles that can allow us to look at the ideal final result
and to come up with solutions to solve our problem.
There are also patterns of evolution that we could look at to help solve
our problem as well, but that’s a little more advanced and we’re
not going to cover it here in this simple newsletter.
The correct pronunciation for the acronym is “trees” but you’ll
hear people say “trizz” or “trees” interchangeably.
The way I like to look at these forty principles Altshuller came up with
is as “lenses.” They’re individual lenses to allow you
to view the world in a unique and innovative way.
Let’s look the at the very first principle Altshuller came up with,
the very first lens, principle one, called Segmentation.
Segmentation is to look at your problem and basically segment it - fragment
it. Transition it to the micro level to look for an answer. Divide an
object maybe into independent parts.
Here’s some examples; Think about stone washed jeans. Now that was
a way to differentiate jeans by segmentation, where your using small stones
as you wash jeans to give them a unique feel and look.
How about a muffler on a car or lawnmower?
Looking at it from a segmented point of view, you might come up with a
lot better design to have twenty or thirty small mufflers inside the muffler,
which would make it actually perform better.
How about corporate subsidiaries? Or Skunk work teams?
Think about fighting fire with mist. Now one of the problems that we have
with fighting fires is that, once you get the fire out, you’ve deluged
it with so much water that there’s water damage, so the water has
damaged usually the home and the furniture as well.
If you look at it from a segmented point of view, you can actually fight
a fire better with small, little segmented droplets of water, so you don’t
need as much water mass to put the fire out, but it’s more efficient
by putting it out with mist.
And then think about JIT - Just In Time Processing.
Here’s some personal examples of mine where I tried to use the segmentation
lens in my own business. My video newsletters, for example. I’m
trying to take one concept and give you an example and explanation around
it and trying to keep it brief. By segmenting it this way, hopefully it
makes it easier for you, the listener, to learn the concept.
Another example is a book called The One-Page Proposal. It’s been
a great reference book for me, and I’ve used the concepts in here
many, many times. It teaches you how to persuasively put a proposal together
on one-page, so it’s segmenting it where you’re targeting
specifically a senior executive who doesn’t have time to read an
entire business proposal, but does have time to read a three to four minute
one-page proposal.
The last personal example of mine, around Segmentation, is a book called
Animals in Translation by Temple Grandin. She is a professor of Animal
Science, but she also is autistic.
It’s a really interesting book in that her theory is that people
that are autistic cannot see things in a mosaic or composite picture -
that they experience the world in segmented pieces, much like animals
do.
Her theory is that
animals can’t see things in composite pictures like humans because
that part of their brain isn’t developed the same way as a normal
human’s are, that their brain is more similar to someone who is
autistic. That analogy and reading this book has given me all kinds of
insight into business and creative, innovative solutions. It makes you
think about how to look at something from a segmented point of view instead
of a composite picture.
|
|